I like and respect both of these premier league legends, for me though, I
would prefer LAMPARD all day long. LAMPARD is the better all round player.
Also, Gerard had himself to blame for not winning the premier league, that
is probably the biggest mistake of his career, he mis-controlled an easy
pass and slip. Yes, he has carried Liverpool but that mistake would mean
that he cost Liverpool their first ever premier league title. If they drew
that game, Liverpool would have won the league, obviously. Suarez was the
main man that season for Liverpool anyway.
By Conor O'Shaughnessy, February 13, 2015 @ 10:30 pm
Both are legends. Lampard has a bit better stats and bigger influence in
the Champions League , but however Gerrard achieved the thing that nobody
can achieve, motivate his team to win the CL after loosing 3:0 at the
halftime , this is just… Great. They are good in different occasions
By Sam Mannings-Hill, February 13, 2015 @ 11:35 pm
Gerrard played in what was the worst Liverpool team ever in their history,
and managed what he has done. He carried Liverpool for 4-5 seasons. He is
an all round package. Lampard is a better midfielder, but Gerrard is a
better PLAYER. He has played everywhere for Liverpool apart from in goal.
Don’t get me wrong, Lampard is good, but Gerrard will always be better.
both legends but Gerrard is better then lampard all lampard can do is kick
goals Gerrard can assist kick goals and defend he is the complete package
lampard scores goals when chelsea is up a goal or two Gerrard scores goals
when the team is in trouble and looking for a hero Steven Gerrard is a
better player then Frank Lampard is
Everything Gerrard has done, Lampard has done more. He has the goal ratio
of a top class striker, scoring 20 goals a season for 5 consecutive
seasons, he gets around the same in assists.
Everyone says Gerrard is the full package because he can attack, defend,
pass, long range, set pieces etc, why dont they say the same about Lampard,
There seems to be a myth that Gerrard is a “great” at defending, the
majority of people base this on youtube videos of Gerrard making a few
dramatic bone crunching tackles and they say he’s great defensively.
Whereas Lampard is as good, if not better defensively his positional sense
is brilliant to intercept and he’s a great tackler.
In fact I’d say the only things that Gerrard is better at are speed and set
piece delivery. In terms of “big games” Lampard has finished in top 4
goalscoreres everytime chelsea have won the league, he almost single
handedly delivered the early titles under mourinho. He’s also scored in fa
cup and champions league finals same as Gerrard, yet people only praise
Gerrard.
However the major difference between them is that Gerrard was born with
natural talent, Speed, aggression, passing range etc all came naturally to
him. Frank Lampard was just an average footballer like anyone but he
practised so hard on his he MADE himself world class when really he didnt
have the natural talent for it.. That is why Lampard has my respect.
By TheThomasEdition HD, February 14, 2015 @ 1:23 am
Gerrard is the better overall player and has carried a bpl side o are shit
and he has still won trophies including the greatest champions league final
of all time. Lampard has had great players around him for his success. If
you put lampard and gerrard on a one on one gerrard would completely
dominate him because he’s a better tackle, passer, leader, a lot more pace
than fat frank, a better long range shot than anyone I have ever seen and
he’s a leader who drives a team for forward by himself. Lampard has not got
them qualities as a leader. Jt beat him to the armband, says it all really.
Helloooooo, Chelsea won 2-0 with Liverpool not 1-0 so he didn’t ruin it.
And if you take a look at Gerrard’s free kicks. Wow. Amazing. He’s a real
legend!
Gerrard has had been in an average Liverpool team for a long time, while
Lampard has been in one of the best sides in europe for years, both are
amazing players but Gerrard has to be better as he is everything Lampard is
and more. If Lampard played at Liverpool and Gerrard was at Chelsea there
is only one winner Gerrard because he would of been around an amazing team.
Gerrard has a leadership that Lampard could only wish about.
both of them are the players of same skill and quality. There is one
difference between them that is—-Gerrard plays in Liverpool and Lampard
plays in Chealsea
Most of Gerrard’s goals are created from other people creating a chance and
giving him the ball where as Lampard’s skill and technicality allowed him
to create the chances and finish them
I’m a chelsea fan but I say stevie g is better simply because we have had
legends such as Cech terry drogba and ballack at chelsea but in Liverpool
Gerrard was always th eir talisman and they need him a lot more than we
need lamps their would be no Liverpool without Gerrard I was actually
hoping that Liverpool would win the title instead of man city but not
chelsea as Liverpool really deserved it
By Evaldo Cursino Dias, February 14, 2015 @ 8:27 am
By Ryan McKenna, February 13, 2015 @ 9:01 pm
Unlike most of the Gerrard haters, who are jealous of his huge success at
Liverpool, here’s an honest opinion from a fan who looks at both sides.
Lampard, in terms of stats, is better. Far better in fact, but does that
mean I’d rather have him over Gerrard? No chance.
Both are English legends and should be treated as such. Gerrard provides a
level of leadership and motivation that Lampard can only dream of.
By fred salt, February 13, 2015 @ 9:38 pm
I like and respect both of these premier league legends, for me though, I
would prefer LAMPARD all day long. LAMPARD is the better all round player.
Also, Gerard had himself to blame for not winning the premier league, that
is probably the biggest mistake of his career, he mis-controlled an easy
pass and slip. Yes, he has carried Liverpool but that mistake would mean
that he cost Liverpool their first ever premier league title. If they drew
that game, Liverpool would have won the league, obviously. Suarez was the
main man that season for Liverpool anyway.
By Conor O'Shaughnessy, February 13, 2015 @ 10:30 pm
Gerrard > Lampard 100%
By Boyan Veltchev, February 13, 2015 @ 11:24 pm
Both are legends. Lampard has a bit better stats and bigger influence in
the Champions League , but however Gerrard achieved the thing that nobody
can achieve, motivate his team to win the CL after loosing 3:0 at the
halftime , this is just… Great. They are good in different occasions
By Sam Mannings-Hill, February 13, 2015 @ 11:35 pm
Gerrard played in what was the worst Liverpool team ever in their history,
and managed what he has done. He carried Liverpool for 4-5 seasons. He is
an all round package. Lampard is a better midfielder, but Gerrard is a
better PLAYER. He has played everywhere for Liverpool apart from in goal.
Don’t get me wrong, Lampard is good, but Gerrard will always be better.
By Dimitri Marras, February 14, 2015 @ 12:14 am
both legends but Gerrard is better then lampard all lampard can do is kick
goals Gerrard can assist kick goals and defend he is the complete package
lampard scores goals when chelsea is up a goal or two Gerrard scores goals
when the team is in trouble and looking for a hero Steven Gerrard is a
better player then Frank Lampard is
By omario8822, February 14, 2015 @ 12:24 am
The answer is quite simple.
Frank Lampard is the better player by a whisker.
Everything Gerrard has done, Lampard has done more. He has the goal ratio
of a top class striker, scoring 20 goals a season for 5 consecutive
seasons, he gets around the same in assists.
Everyone says Gerrard is the full package because he can attack, defend,
pass, long range, set pieces etc, why dont they say the same about Lampard,
There seems to be a myth that Gerrard is a “great” at defending, the
majority of people base this on youtube videos of Gerrard making a few
dramatic bone crunching tackles and they say he’s great defensively.
Whereas Lampard is as good, if not better defensively his positional sense
is brilliant to intercept and he’s a great tackler.
In fact I’d say the only things that Gerrard is better at are speed and set
piece delivery. In terms of “big games” Lampard has finished in top 4
goalscoreres everytime chelsea have won the league, he almost single
handedly delivered the early titles under mourinho. He’s also scored in fa
cup and champions league finals same as Gerrard, yet people only praise
Gerrard.
However the major difference between them is that Gerrard was born with
natural talent, Speed, aggression, passing range etc all came naturally to
him. Frank Lampard was just an average footballer like anyone but he
practised so hard on his he MADE himself world class when really he didnt
have the natural talent for it.. That is why Lampard has my respect.
By TheThomasEdition HD, February 14, 2015 @ 1:23 am
Gerrard is the better overall player and has carried a bpl side o are shit
and he has still won trophies including the greatest champions league final
of all time. Lampard has had great players around him for his success. If
you put lampard and gerrard on a one on one gerrard would completely
dominate him because he’s a better tackle, passer, leader, a lot more pace
than fat frank, a better long range shot than anyone I have ever seen and
he’s a leader who drives a team for forward by himself. Lampard has not got
them qualities as a leader. Jt beat him to the armband, says it all really.
By igor lysiak, February 14, 2015 @ 2:03 am
Helloooooo, Chelsea won 2-0 with Liverpool not 1-0 so he didn’t ruin it.
And if you take a look at Gerrard’s free kicks. Wow. Amazing. He’s a real
legend!
By achu, February 14, 2015 @ 3:02 am
Two legends that are incomparable to each other.
By Alex Wilson, February 14, 2015 @ 3:16 am
It doesn’t matter about statistics. Frank Lampard is clearly seen as the
better player. Better shooting, better with the ball!
By Chloe Herbert, February 14, 2015 @ 3:24 am
Steve Gerrard ,Gerrard he passes the ball 40 yards he’s big and he’s fokin
hard steve Gerrard,Gerrard
By Oliver Humphreys, February 14, 2015 @ 3:49 am
gerrard definitly
By Reds Dahom, February 14, 2015 @ 4:45 am
Lampard .. forever in Gerrard’s shadow!
By john mcnabb, February 14, 2015 @ 5:42 am
Anyone who knows anything will say gerrard is the better player by far
By Maximiliano Alignani, February 14, 2015 @ 5:55 am
I prefer Lampard all the way (I’m not english so neutrally speaking)
By GreenyG7, February 14, 2015 @ 6:02 am
Gerrard has had been in an average Liverpool team for a long time, while
Lampard has been in one of the best sides in europe for years, both are
amazing players but Gerrard has to be better as he is everything Lampard is
and more. If Lampard played at Liverpool and Gerrard was at Chelsea there
is only one winner Gerrard because he would of been around an amazing team.
Gerrard has a leadership that Lampard could only wish about.
By Neelam Makh, February 14, 2015 @ 6:06 am
Gerrard is bettr
By Endre Andersen, February 14, 2015 @ 6:32 am
Gerrardddddddddddddd is best
By damilola Olan, February 14, 2015 @ 6:36 am
Sir Frank Lampard.☺
By Nazmus Sakib, February 14, 2015 @ 7:10 am
both of them are the players of same skill and quality. There is one
difference between them that is—-Gerrard plays in Liverpool and Lampard
plays in Chealsea
By Swe107beast, February 14, 2015 @ 7:15 am
Lampard
By Cameron Neale, February 14, 2015 @ 7:43 am
Most of Gerrard’s goals are created from other people creating a chance and
giving him the ball where as Lampard’s skill and technicality allowed him
to create the chances and finish them
By Kisuke Urahara, February 14, 2015 @ 8:09 am
I’m a chelsea fan but I say stevie g is better simply because we have had
legends such as Cech terry drogba and ballack at chelsea but in Liverpool
Gerrard was always th eir talisman and they need him a lot more than we
need lamps their would be no Liverpool without Gerrard I was actually
hoping that Liverpool would win the title instead of man city but not
chelsea as Liverpool really deserved it
By Evaldo Cursino Dias, February 14, 2015 @ 8:27 am
Lampard is better you know